Driven to Safety: How Litigation Spurred Auto Safety Innovations
In the wake of Toyota’s sudden acceleration scandal, automobile safety is once again a hot-button issue. After internal documents showed Toyota knew about potential defects, hid them from regulators, and even bragged about saving money from limiting its recalls, Toyota received the largest fine ever levied against an auto manufacturer.
After 50 deaths and 8.5 million recalled cars, this saga is yet another example of regulation as an incomplete safeguard and manufacturers that put profits over safety. Unfortunately, this scenario has been repeating itself for decades.
In the 1960s, court cases began highlighting the dangers of car design and the willful negligence of manufacturers in designing cars that they knew to be unsafe. Since then the civil justice system has worked hand-in-hand with regulation to protect Americans, while spurring generations of safety innovations.
Litigation will ultimately play a key role in identifying what went wrong with Toyota. These findings will aid regulators and legislators in protecting the American public in the future. By holding manufacturers accountable, the civil justice system will continue to spur safety innovations, as it has done for half a century.
This article has been published with the approval of the American Association for Justice.
Click on the car below to view 11 safety innovations in automobiles where litigation played a critical role. This includes gas tanks, side impact design, seat belts, roof crush, tires, electronic stability control, door latches, illusory park, air bags, power windows, and seats.
To download a copy of “What Would Cars Be Like Without the Civil Justice System,” click here.